If it slipped anybody’s discover as to who was beating whom to the punch in honoring the primary African American world heavyweight boxing champ, the present president was blissful to remind us:
“Congress has supported quite a few resolutions calling for Johnson’s pardon,” mentioned Trump within the White Home ceremony. “… No President ever signed it, surprisingly. They thought it was going to be signed within the final administration and that did not occur. In order that was very disappointing for lots of people.”
Flanked by boxing champions and actor Sylvester Stallone, the “Rocky” star who introduced Johnson’s case to Trump’s consideration, the president famous that his motion loved widespread bipartisan assist, “together with from the Congressional Black Caucus,” which “supported it very, very powerfully, very strongly.”
We get it. The nation’s first African-American president dragged his heels on issuing a posthumous pardon to Johnson. As a substitute he left the duty to Trump, whose civil rights report, to place it mildly, has attracted critics like a cow pasture attracts flies.
How did that occur? Mockingly, within the case of Johnson’s pardon, 105 years after the champ’s baseless conviction for violating the Mann Act — a criminal offense that amounted to touring with a white girl — Trump’s shoot-from-the-lip type seems to have paid off. President Obama, like President George W. Bush earlier than him, deliberated completely and sought a Justice Division advice earlier than granting clemency. However the advice by no means got here.
Bush and Obama, like most presidents earlier than them, rigorously adhered to the norms of their excessive workplace. Keep in mind norms? Trump treats norms like porn star Stormy Daniels treats clothes in her stripper act, as in the event that they solely get in the way in which of his efficiency.
Trump, in contrast, did not watch for anyone else’s approval. After longtime buddy Stallone made a private plea for Trump to grant the pardon, Trump apparently spent little time, if any, burrowing by means of Washington purple tape earlier than he took motion. He simply did it.
That could be simply as properly, contemplating the unlucky racial tinge to Washington’s gridlock within the Obama period.
Filmmaker Ken Burns, whose 2004 PBS documentary on Johnson, “Unforgivable Blackness,” spurred the newest motion to pardon him, recalled in a USA At the moment interview that the Workplace of the Pardon Lawyer flatly shot down the applying throughout the Bush years. Workforce Bush cited longstanding Justice Division coverage that gave precedence to candidates who had been nonetheless alive and thus “can actually profit from a grant of clemency.”
Johnson himself had utilized for a pardon in 1920, as he served a 10-month sentence for his 1913 conviction. Even the legal professional normal at the moment famous that the regulation was meant to punish human trafficking, not consensual relationships.
When President Obama took workplace, many noticed a pure ally in Johnson’s trigger, however he, too, caught with the Justice Division’s coverage in opposition to posthumous pardons.
“Might you think about what would occur, given the racial dimension of this, if a black president and a black legal professional normal had urged a posthumous pardon for Jack Johnson?” Burns instructed USA At the moment.
That black legal professional normal, Eric Holder, sympathized. There was “no query” that Johnson’s conviction was a historic injustice, Holder instructed a New York tv station in 2016. Nonetheless, he mentioned, there have been “countervailing issues about the way in which he handled girls.”
Experiences and rumors of womanizing and bodily abuse added a component of controversy that has solely grown throughout the present period of #MeToo.
It appears piquantly acceptable, then, that Trump, whose language and alleged conduct have been focused and condemned by the #MeToo motion, amongst others, could be the president to defy at present’s political etiquette on behalf of Johnson, who flamboyantly defied the racist politics of his day.
And I say that is OK. Contemplating the bizarro nature of Trumpian insurance policies, as a few of my Twitter followers sarcastically noticed, if Obama had pardoned Johnson, Trump may properly have tried to reverse it, simply as he has tried to purge each different remnant of Obama’s legacy.
As a substitute, a person who typically has been criticized — typically with justification — for racial insensitivity will get credit score for granting the symbolic, but nonetheless vital, pardon to Johnson. I’ve been a frequent critic of Trump’s bull-in-a-china-shop type. However this time he scored a knockout.
(c) 2018 CLARENCE PAGE DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.
Web page is a Pulitzer Prize-winning syndicated columnist specializing in city points. He’s primarily based in Washington, D.C. E-mail: email@example.com