Data Elevate Questions About Ford’s Double-Door Story


Former CIA Director John Brennan assures us that Supreme Courtroom nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, is “a nationwide treasure.” And his former colleague, James Comey, has urged investigators to “dig deeper.”

So start initially of her Senate Judiciary Committee testimony: “I had by no means instructed the small print to anybody till Might 2012, throughout a pair’s counseling session. The explanation this got here up in counseling is that my husband and I had accomplished a really in depth, very lengthy rework of our house and I insisted on a second entrance door, an concept that he and others disagreed with and couldn’t perceive. In explaining why I wished a second entrance door, I started to explain the assault intimately.”

Below questioning from Sen. Diane Feinstein, Ford described an agonizing after-effect of the alleged Kavanaugh assault that induced her to demand that second door: “Nervousness, phobia and PTSD-like signs are the forms of issues that I’ve been dealing with,” Ford mentioned. “Extra specifically, claustrophobia, panic and that sort of factor.”

FEINSTEIN: “Is that the rationale for the second entrance door? Claustrophobia?” 

FORD: “Appropriate.”

The trade-off, apparently, was evident in Ford’s assertion that “our home doesn’t look aesthetically pleasing from the curb.” From the view on Google Earth, or Redfin, one can’t see the second door simply and the home seems no uglier “from the curb” than it ever did, if it did. However a look at the actual property databases about Ford’s home are instructive.

The Fords purchased the home on June 20, 2007. And the “very in depth, very lengthy rework,” together with the second entrance door, have been accomplished beneath a constructing allow granted in 2008. 

So a pure query is why, 4 years after the reworking, which additionally added two rooms and a rest room, is the set up of that second door nonetheless such a bone of competition between the couple that it was a difficulty within the counseling they have been present process in Might 2012?

One key could also be Ford’s persevering with testimony to Feinstein, after describing the aesthetic difficulties “from the curb.”

FEINSTEIN: “I see. And do you have got that second entrance door?”

FORD: “Sure.”


FORD: “It — it now’s a spot to host Google interns. As a result of we reside close to Google, so we get to have — different college students can reside there.”

Now that she mentions it, the extra reworking in impact added a self-contained unit to the home, with its personal entrance, excellent for “internet hosting” and even probably renting, in violation of the native zoning. Maybe an expert workplace is likely to be an ideal use, if an unlawful one. And within the tight Palo Alto actual property market, there are loads of video games performed for some severe revenue.

And which will reply one other unusual anomaly. As a result of since 1993, and  by some listings even at the moment, there was one other tenant at what’s now the Ford property. It’s listed as this particular person’s residence from 1993 to July 2007, every week or so after she offered the home to the Fords.

Her title is Dr. Sylvia Randall, and she or he listed this deal with for her California licensed follow of psychotherapy, together with {couples} psychotherapy, till her transfer to Oregon in 2007.  

Presently she solely practices in that state, the place she additionally pursues her new profession as a gifted artist as effectively.  

However many current directories nonetheless have Dr. Randall’s deal with listed at what’s now the Ford residence.

Which raises different questions. Why has Christine Ford by no means mentioned a phrase about Dr. Randall? And why has she been evasive in regards to the transcripts of her essential 2012 remedy session, which she will’t appear to recall a lot about both? Did she present them to the Washington Publish, or did she simply present the therapist’s abstract? Who was the psychologist?

In a telephone name, I requested Dr. Randall if she had offered her home to the Fords. She requested again how I had came upon. I requested if she was the {couples} therapist who handled the Fords. She wouldn’t reply sure or no, replying, “I’m a {couples} therapist.”

So was the second door an escape for Christine Blasey Ford’s terrors or was documenting her terrors a ruse for sneaking a rental unit by powerful native zoning ordinances? And if the second door allowed entry and egress for the tenant of a second housing unit, slightly than for the first resident, how did the door’s existence ameliorate Ford’s professed claustrophobia?

None of because of this her expenses in opposition to Kavanaugh won’t be completely legitimate, however her rationalization for the “second door” appears prefer it may use extra investigation. On the very least it seems to be a much more sophisticated ingredient of Ford’s credibility than it initially appeared.

Thomas H. Lipscomb is the founding writer of Instances Books. His information reporting has appeared within the Chicago Solar-Instances, New York Solar and different papers. As a digital entrepreneur he has based and served as CEO of two public firms primarily based upon his patents.